Yesterday in addition to going to theVancouver Police Museum’s Blood Spatter for Adults, I was invited to a special wine tasting event with wines from Hester Creek (one of our favourite vineyards in fact). It’s no secret that I enjoy wine. I know a little bit about wine, enough to know what I like and I don’t. I’m not, however, a wine expert by any stretch of the imagination. I was, in fact, not “one of the usual suspects” at this event in the least. I know enough to swirl and sniff before I taste. I also let the wine linger a bit before I swallow. And that’s a big difference. Spit out wine! Especially great wine! Heaven forfend!
I don’t go to a whiskey tasting and spit an aged Scotch into a bucket. That would just be wrong.
At a wine tasting I’m totally out of my element. I don’t really know what to ask to say or anything but what I like and what I don’t. My being there, as an “unusual” suspect, wasn’t by accident. Leeann Froese invited me because she knew I loved (and can appreciate) good wine. And that I didn’t usually go to these events.
So while I will post about the wines soon, this post is about something that many groups face, always having the “usual suspects” speak or attend events.
We’ve been having this discussion recently within the Vancouver social media crowd. Mostly focusing on who speaks at events, but I think it’s more than that. I think we’re missing out on new ideas, perspectives, and insights when we don’t keep bringing new people, unusual suspects, to events. I don’t think social media is being exclusionary any more than any other group. People do like to talk shop with others in their industry We have a lot in common, so it’s normal it hang out together. But maybe to mix things up a bit we should all try to bring a new person to a tweet up or Third Tuesday or Social Media Club event.
Whatever we do in the future, I know that being an “unusual suspect” at an event was very interesting and I did learn a lot more about wine that I didn’t know before.
Besides the fact that it tastes good.