<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MindView 3 for Mac better than MindManger 7 for Mac? Looks like it</title>
	<atom:link href="http://trishussey.com/2009/02/26/mindview-3-for-mac-better-than-mindmanger-7-for-mac-looks-like-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://trishussey.com/2009/02/26/mindview-3-for-mac-better-than-mindmanger-7-for-mac-looks-like-it/</link>
	<description>Social Media News, WordPress Info and Opinion from Tris Hussey author of Create Your Own Blog, Using WordPress and Teach Yourself Foursquare</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 02:57:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://trishussey.com/2009/02/26/mindview-3-for-mac-better-than-mindmanger-7-for-mac-looks-like-it/#comment-10133</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2010 02:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trishussey.com/2009/02/26/mindview-3-for-mac-better-than-mindmanger-7-for-mac-looks-like-it/#comment-10133</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d have to say it looses on 2 key grounds, had it both of these 3 I probably would have forked over my cash!
1. No import/export from MindManager 
- MindManager is used by all of my office, if you cant import/export to that, then its a no-show,
do not collect $200 (or rather $300!) go directly to jail..!

2. No Mac version of the business version (with basic Gant Chart Integration)
- The main reason I&#039;m looking at this in the first place (and would consider the price-tag) is
its ability to simply go from Mind Maps to Timelines (for customers) to Project Tools (for management)

Without those 2 then its just a piece of over-priced mind-management software, at x2-x3 the price of its  competition. No way am I paying $300 for a piece of Mac softtware thats not directly compatible with the rest of my Mac and PC colleagues, and just does a timline (something that you can find 10 programs for $25 on google!).

Its a real pity though...many Mac users dont have project management software, and something to go from mind-management to a timeline to a project-view would be really, really nice...
but dropping computability with the incumbent in mind-management, and removing the one feature that would justify its high price-tag (basic quick project management), means its just massively over-priced mind-management with a time-line.....

Disappointing.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d have to say it looses on 2 key grounds, had it both of these 3 I probably would have forked over my cash!<br />
1. No import/export from MindManager<br />
- MindManager is used by all of my office, if you cant import/export to that, then its a no-show,<br />
do not collect $200 (or rather $300!) go directly to jail..!</p>
<p>2. No Mac version of the business version (with basic Gant Chart Integration)<br />
- The main reason I&#8217;m looking at this in the first place (and would consider the price-tag) is<br />
its ability to simply go from Mind Maps to Timelines (for customers) to Project Tools (for management)</p>
<p>Without those 2 then its just a piece of over-priced mind-management software, at x2-x3 the price of its  competition. No way am I paying $300 for a piece of Mac softtware thats not directly compatible with the rest of my Mac and PC colleagues, and just does a timline (something that you can find 10 programs for $25 on google!).</p>
<p>Its a real pity though&#8230;many Mac users dont have project management software, and something to go from mind-management to a timeline to a project-view would be really, really nice&#8230;<br />
but dropping computability with the incumbent in mind-management, and removing the one feature that would justify its high price-tag (basic quick project management), means its just massively over-priced mind-management with a time-line&#8230;..</p>
<p>Disappointing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tris Hussey</title>
		<link>http://trishussey.com/2009/02/26/mindview-3-for-mac-better-than-mindmanger-7-for-mac-looks-like-it/#comment-6392</link>
		<dc:creator>Tris Hussey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 21:35:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trishussey.com/2009/02/26/mindview-3-for-mac-better-than-mindmanger-7-for-mac-looks-like-it/#comment-6392</guid>
		<description>YW. That would be a great promotion. Hmm...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YW. That would be a great promotion. Hmm&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tris Hussey</title>
		<link>http://trishussey.com/2009/02/26/mindview-3-for-mac-better-than-mindmanger-7-for-mac-looks-like-it/#comment-11736</link>
		<dc:creator>Tris Hussey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 21:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trishussey.com/2009/02/26/mindview-3-for-mac-better-than-mindmanger-7-for-mac-looks-like-it/#comment-11736</guid>
		<description>YW. That would be a great promotion. Hmm...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YW. That would be a great promotion. Hmm&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Bookspan</title>
		<link>http://trishussey.com/2009/02/26/mindview-3-for-mac-better-than-mindmanger-7-for-mac-looks-like-it/#comment-6391</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Bookspan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 21:11:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trishussey.com/2009/02/26/mindview-3-for-mac-better-than-mindmanger-7-for-mac-looks-like-it/#comment-6391</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the mention! I think Matcheare might have competitive crossgrade pricing too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the mention! I think Matcheare might have competitive crossgrade pricing too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Bookspan</title>
		<link>http://trishussey.com/2009/02/26/mindview-3-for-mac-better-than-mindmanger-7-for-mac-looks-like-it/#comment-11735</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Bookspan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 21:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trishussey.com/2009/02/26/mindview-3-for-mac-better-than-mindmanger-7-for-mac-looks-like-it/#comment-11735</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the mention! I think Matcheare might have competitive crossgrade pricing too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the mention! I think Matcheare might have competitive crossgrade pricing too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

