<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Does accepting a sponsor&#8217;s money mean you condone or support them?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://trishussey.com/2009/01/30/does-accepting-a-sponsors-money-mean-you-condone-or-support-them/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://trishussey.com/2009/01/30/does-accepting-a-sponsors-money-mean-you-condone-or-support-them/</link>
	<description>Social Media News, WordPress Info and Opinion from Tris Hussey author of Create Your Own Blog, Using WordPress and Teach Yourself Foursquare</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 02:57:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: MLDina</title>
		<link>http://trishussey.com/2009/01/30/does-accepting-a-sponsors-money-mean-you-condone-or-support-them/#comment-6314</link>
		<dc:creator>MLDina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 22:26:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trishussey.com/2009/01/30/does-accepting-a-sponsors-money-mean-you-condone-or-support-them/#comment-6314</guid>
		<description>I think it depends on the depth of the sponsorship. If it was just a banner or sign, raising awareness to the existence of a group is harmless, in my opinion. If the group (political or not), is hosting a main event at a conference, and I was against the cause, I probably wouldn&#039;t show up. I don&#039;t think I&#039;d skip a show over a banner, though. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it depends on the depth of the sponsorship. If it was just a banner or sign, raising awareness to the existence of a group is harmless, in my opinion. If the group (political or not), is hosting a main event at a conference, and I was against the cause, I probably wouldn&#039;t show up. I don&#039;t think I&#039;d skip a show over a banner, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MLDina</title>
		<link>http://trishussey.com/2009/01/30/does-accepting-a-sponsors-money-mean-you-condone-or-support-them/#comment-10902</link>
		<dc:creator>MLDina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 22:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trishussey.com/2009/01/30/does-accepting-a-sponsors-money-mean-you-condone-or-support-them/#comment-10902</guid>
		<description>I think it depends on the depth of the sponsorship. If it was just a banner or sign, raising awareness to the existence of a group is harmless, in my opinion. If the group (political or not), is hosting a main event at a conference, and I was against the cause, I probably wouldn&#039;t show up. I don&#039;t think I&#039;d skip a show over a banner, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it depends on the depth of the sponsorship. If it was just a banner or sign, raising awareness to the existence of a group is harmless, in my opinion. If the group (political or not), is hosting a main event at a conference, and I was against the cause, I probably wouldn&#039;t show up. I don&#039;t think I&#039;d skip a show over a banner, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vancouver Blogger Gus Greeper &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Northern Voice is a FULL sell out - to the BC Liberals that is</title>
		<link>http://trishussey.com/2009/01/30/does-accepting-a-sponsors-money-mean-you-condone-or-support-them/#comment-6313</link>
		<dc:creator>Vancouver Blogger Gus Greeper &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Northern Voice is a FULL sell out - to the BC Liberals that is</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 21:22:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trishussey.com/2009/01/30/does-accepting-a-sponsors-money-mean-you-condone-or-support-them/#comment-6313</guid>
		<description>[...] plate I wouldn&#8217;t have gone based on principle alone. [posts regarding the dinner: Derek, Jen, Tris &amp; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] plate I wouldn&#8217;t have gone based on principle alone. [posts regarding the dinner: Derek, Jen, Tris &amp; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek K. Miller</title>
		<link>http://trishussey.com/2009/01/30/does-accepting-a-sponsors-money-mean-you-condone-or-support-them/#comment-6302</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek K. Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 23:43:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trishussey.com/2009/01/30/does-accepting-a-sponsors-money-mean-you-condone-or-support-them/#comment-6302</guid>
		<description>In most cases, whether you&#039;re dealing with a political party or not, a sponsor would prefer (or demand) to be the sole sponsor of their type -- which is why you don&#039;t see both Coke and Pepsi, or both McDonald&#039;s and Burger King, sponsoring the Olympics. 
 
Based on comments around the web on this issue, it seems that following the offer from the BC Liberals, the Northern Voice committee asked some of the other parties if they were interested too, and they were not. I&#039;m not sure if that&#039;s the reason, but there you go. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In most cases, whether you&#039;re dealing with a political party or not, a sponsor would prefer (or demand) to be the sole sponsor of their type &#8212; which is why you don&#039;t see both Coke and Pepsi, or both McDonald&#039;s and Burger King, sponsoring the Olympics. </p>
<p>Based on comments around the web on this issue, it seems that following the offer from the BC Liberals, the Northern Voice committee asked some of the other parties if they were interested too, and they were not. I&#039;m not sure if that&#039;s the reason, but there you go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek K. Miller</title>
		<link>http://trishussey.com/2009/01/30/does-accepting-a-sponsors-money-mean-you-condone-or-support-them/#comment-10901</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek K. Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 23:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trishussey.com/2009/01/30/does-accepting-a-sponsors-money-mean-you-condone-or-support-them/#comment-10901</guid>
		<description>In most cases, whether you&#039;re dealing with a political party or not, a sponsor would prefer (or demand) to be the sole sponsor of their type -- which is why you don&#039;t see both Coke and Pepsi, or both McDonald&#039;s and Burger King, sponsoring the Olympics. 
 
Based on comments around the web on this issue, it seems that following the offer from the BC Liberals, the Northern Voice committee asked some of the other parties if they were interested too, and they were not. I&#039;m not sure if that&#039;s the reason, but there you go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In most cases, whether you&#039;re dealing with a political party or not, a sponsor would prefer (or demand) to be the sole sponsor of their type &#8212; which is why you don&#039;t see both Coke and Pepsi, or both McDonald&#039;s and Burger King, sponsoring the Olympics. </p>
<p>Based on comments around the web on this issue, it seems that following the offer from the BC Liberals, the Northern Voice committee asked some of the other parties if they were interested too, and they were not. I&#039;m not sure if that&#039;s the reason, but there you go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sillygwailo</title>
		<link>http://trishussey.com/2009/01/30/does-accepting-a-sponsors-money-mean-you-condone-or-support-them/#comment-6301</link>
		<dc:creator>sillygwailo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 21:19:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trishussey.com/2009/01/30/does-accepting-a-sponsors-money-mean-you-condone-or-support-them/#comment-6301</guid>
		<description>There was a missed setting in the permissions for comments. I&#039;ve set it so that all legitimate comments should go through now.  
 
(I help administer the site on behalf of NV.) </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There was a missed setting in the permissions for comments. I&#039;ve set it so that all legitimate comments should go through now.  </p>
<p>(I help administer the site on behalf of NV.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://trishussey.com/2009/01/30/does-accepting-a-sponsors-money-mean-you-condone-or-support-them/#comment-10900</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 21:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trishussey.com/2009/01/30/does-accepting-a-sponsors-money-mean-you-condone-or-support-them/#comment-10900</guid>
		<description>There was a missed setting in the permissions for comments. I&#039;ve set it so that all legitimate comments should go through now.  
 
(I help administer the site on behalf of NV.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There was a missed setting in the permissions for comments. I&#039;ve set it so that all legitimate comments should go through now.  </p>
<p>(I help administer the site on behalf of NV.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Husband</title>
		<link>http://trishussey.com/2009/01/30/does-accepting-a-sponsors-money-mean-you-condone-or-support-them/#comment-6300</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Husband</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 06:57:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trishussey.com/2009/01/30/does-accepting-a-sponsors-money-mean-you-condone-or-support-them/#comment-6300</guid>
		<description>What Mack D. Male and Derek Miller said re: reputational influence .. the word sponsorship carries the issue here.  There is always some form of exchange with sponsorship, even it is not explicitly visible, that&#039;s why there are sponsorship committees, to decide what the best quid pro quo is and why.  We live in such an advertising-and-branding saturated word that we have become benumbed or inattentive to the basic issues, and then of course relativism creeps on into the party.  But hey, we are supposedly living in a pomo world, right ? 
 
Here&#039;s an interesting test .. would the organizing committee have accepted equal sponsorships from both the BC Liberals and the BC NDP, and if so, would each party respectively have been comfortable as co-sponsor ?  It would be interesting to find out the answers to those two questions. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What Mack D. Male and Derek Miller said re: reputational influence .. the word sponsorship carries the issue here.  There is always some form of exchange with sponsorship, even it is not explicitly visible, that&#039;s why there are sponsorship committees, to decide what the best quid pro quo is and why.  We live in such an advertising-and-branding saturated word that we have become benumbed or inattentive to the basic issues, and then of course relativism creeps on into the party.  But hey, we are supposedly living in a pomo world, right ? </p>
<p>Here&#039;s an interesting test .. would the organizing committee have accepted equal sponsorships from both the BC Liberals and the BC NDP, and if so, would each party respectively have been comfortable as co-sponsor ?  It would be interesting to find out the answers to those two questions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Husband</title>
		<link>http://trishussey.com/2009/01/30/does-accepting-a-sponsors-money-mean-you-condone-or-support-them/#comment-10899</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Husband</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 06:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trishussey.com/2009/01/30/does-accepting-a-sponsors-money-mean-you-condone-or-support-them/#comment-10899</guid>
		<description>What Mack D. Male and Derek Miller said re: reputational influence .. the word sponsorship carries the issue here.  There is always some form of exchange with sponsorship, even it is not explicitly visible, that&#039;s why there are sponsorship committees, to decide what the best quid pro quo is and why.  We live in such an advertising-and-branding saturated word that we have become benumbed or inattentive to the basic issues, and then of course relativism creeps on into the party.  But hey, we are supposedly living in a pomo world, right ? 
 
Here&#039;s an interesting test .. would the organizing committee have accepted equal sponsorships from both the BC Liberals and the BC NDP, and if so, would each party respectively have been comfortable as co-sponsor ?  It would be interesting to find out the answers to those two questions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What Mack D. Male and Derek Miller said re: reputational influence .. the word sponsorship carries the issue here.  There is always some form of exchange with sponsorship, even it is not explicitly visible, that&#039;s why there are sponsorship committees, to decide what the best quid pro quo is and why.  We live in such an advertising-and-branding saturated word that we have become benumbed or inattentive to the basic issues, and then of course relativism creeps on into the party.  But hey, we are supposedly living in a pomo world, right ? </p>
<p>Here&#039;s an interesting test .. would the organizing committee have accepted equal sponsorships from both the BC Liberals and the BC NDP, and if so, would each party respectively have been comfortable as co-sponsor ?  It would be interesting to find out the answers to those two questions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: raincoaster</title>
		<link>http://trishussey.com/2009/01/30/does-accepting-a-sponsors-money-mean-you-condone-or-support-them/#comment-6299</link>
		<dc:creator>raincoaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 00:05:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trishussey.com/2009/01/30/does-accepting-a-sponsors-money-mean-you-condone-or-support-them/#comment-6299</guid>
		<description>And, yes, suddenly there are everyone&#039;s comments, posted. But it shouldn&#039;t have taken a thunderstorm and the better part of a week to get this done, should it? 
 
I also see the link to the Eventbrite listing to purchase tickets for the party right in the post; that is something I looked for, and did not find, earlier. Now that it appears to be sold out, there&#039;s hardly any point, is there? The link to purchase tickets was sent out on Twitter, I understand, several days ago and not posted in the blog announcement for several days, thus filtering who would get the information in time to act on it and who would not.  
 
These are social media choices that may perhaps be more telling than the committee would like. While a lot of people are on Twitter, not everyone is, and it&#039;s specifically a blogging conference, not a social media one. Perhaps the priorities in this case were backwards. 
 
And, as I said on the NV site, perhaps the solution to this issue is to avoid having parties so extravagant they cannot be staged without the financial support of controversial organizations. They&#039;ve managed it every year up till now, and last year even managed to host a party big enough for everyone instead of one with the capacity of less than half of attendees.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And, yes, suddenly there are everyone&#039;s comments, posted. But it shouldn&#039;t have taken a thunderstorm and the better part of a week to get this done, should it? </p>
<p>I also see the link to the Eventbrite listing to purchase tickets for the party right in the post; that is something I looked for, and did not find, earlier. Now that it appears to be sold out, there&#039;s hardly any point, is there? The link to purchase tickets was sent out on Twitter, I understand, several days ago and not posted in the blog announcement for several days, thus filtering who would get the information in time to act on it and who would not.  </p>
<p>These are social media choices that may perhaps be more telling than the committee would like. While a lot of people are on Twitter, not everyone is, and it&#039;s specifically a blogging conference, not a social media one. Perhaps the priorities in this case were backwards. </p>
<p>And, as I said on the NV site, perhaps the solution to this issue is to avoid having parties so extravagant they cannot be staged without the financial support of controversial organizations. They&#039;ve managed it every year up till now, and last year even managed to host a party big enough for everyone instead of one with the capacity of less than half of attendees.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: raincoaster</title>
		<link>http://trishussey.com/2009/01/30/does-accepting-a-sponsors-money-mean-you-condone-or-support-them/#comment-10898</link>
		<dc:creator>raincoaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 00:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trishussey.com/2009/01/30/does-accepting-a-sponsors-money-mean-you-condone-or-support-them/#comment-10898</guid>
		<description>And, yes, suddenly there are everyone&#039;s comments, posted. But it shouldn&#039;t have taken a thunderstorm and the better part of a week to get this done, should it? 
 
I also see the link to the Eventbrite listing to purchase tickets for the party right in the post; that is something I looked for, and did not find, earlier. Now that it appears to be sold out, there&#039;s hardly any point, is there? The link to purchase tickets was sent out on Twitter, I understand, several days ago and not posted in the blog announcement for several days, thus filtering who would get the information in time to act on it and who would not.  
 
These are social media choices that may perhaps be more telling than the committee would like. While a lot of people are on Twitter, not everyone is, and it&#039;s specifically a blogging conference, not a social media one. Perhaps the priorities in this case were backwards. 
 
And, as I said on the NV site, perhaps the solution to this issue is to avoid having parties so extravagant they cannot be staged without the financial support of controversial organizations. They&#039;ve managed it every year up till now, and last year even managed to host a party big enough for everyone instead of one with the capacity of less than half of attendees.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And, yes, suddenly there are everyone&#039;s comments, posted. But it shouldn&#039;t have taken a thunderstorm and the better part of a week to get this done, should it? </p>
<p>I also see the link to the Eventbrite listing to purchase tickets for the party right in the post; that is something I looked for, and did not find, earlier. Now that it appears to be sold out, there&#039;s hardly any point, is there? The link to purchase tickets was sent out on Twitter, I understand, several days ago and not posted in the blog announcement for several days, thus filtering who would get the information in time to act on it and who would not.  </p>
<p>These are social media choices that may perhaps be more telling than the committee would like. While a lot of people are on Twitter, not everyone is, and it&#039;s specifically a blogging conference, not a social media one. Perhaps the priorities in this case were backwards. </p>
<p>And, as I said on the NV site, perhaps the solution to this issue is to avoid having parties so extravagant they cannot be staged without the financial support of controversial organizations. They&#039;ve managed it every year up till now, and last year even managed to host a party big enough for everyone instead of one with the capacity of less than half of attendees.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: raincoaster</title>
		<link>http://trishussey.com/2009/01/30/does-accepting-a-sponsors-money-mean-you-condone-or-support-them/#comment-6295</link>
		<dc:creator>raincoaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 12:22:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trishussey.com/2009/01/30/does-accepting-a-sponsors-money-mean-you-condone-or-support-them/#comment-6295</guid>
		<description>Travis, when are the comments on the Northern Voice blog going to be approved? None of the comments I&#039;ve ever left on that blog have shown up, including the one I left asking how to purchase tickets for the party. THAT is a negative factor for sure! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Travis, when are the comments on the Northern Voice blog going to be approved? None of the comments I&#039;ve ever left on that blog have shown up, including the one I left asking how to purchase tickets for the party. THAT is a negative factor for sure!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: raincoaster</title>
		<link>http://trishussey.com/2009/01/30/does-accepting-a-sponsors-money-mean-you-condone-or-support-them/#comment-10897</link>
		<dc:creator>raincoaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 12:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trishussey.com/2009/01/30/does-accepting-a-sponsors-money-mean-you-condone-or-support-them/#comment-10897</guid>
		<description>Travis, when are the comments on the Northern Voice blog going to be approved? None of the comments I&#039;ve ever left on that blog have shown up, including the one I left asking how to purchase tickets for the party. THAT is a negative factor for sure!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Travis, when are the comments on the Northern Voice blog going to be approved? None of the comments I&#039;ve ever left on that blog have shown up, including the one I left asking how to purchase tickets for the party. THAT is a negative factor for sure!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Travis Smith</title>
		<link>http://trishussey.com/2009/01/30/does-accepting-a-sponsors-money-mean-you-condone-or-support-them/#comment-6294</link>
		<dc:creator>Travis Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 10:01:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trishussey.com/2009/01/30/does-accepting-a-sponsors-money-mean-you-condone-or-support-them/#comment-6294</guid>
		<description>Tris, 
 
Thanks for blogging about this.  Here&#039;s the organizing committee&#039;s take on the situation: 
 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://2009.northernvoice.ca/blog/reactions-sponsorships&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://2009.northernvoice.ca/blog/reactions-sponsorships&lt;/a&gt;&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://2009.northernvoice.ca/blog/reactions-spons...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
 
TTFN 
Travis </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tris, </p>
<p>Thanks for blogging about this.  Here&#039;s the organizing committee&#039;s take on the situation: </p>
<p><a href="http://2009.northernvoice.ca/blog/reactions-sponsorships" target="_blank"></a><a href="http://2009.northernvoice.ca/blog/reactions-sponsorships</a>&#8221; target=&#8221;_blank&#8221;></a><a href="http://2009.northernvoice.ca/blog/reactions-spons..." rel="nofollow">http://2009.northernvoice.ca/blog/reactions-spons&#8230;</a></p>
<p>TTFN<br />
Travis</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Travis Smith</title>
		<link>http://trishussey.com/2009/01/30/does-accepting-a-sponsors-money-mean-you-condone-or-support-them/#comment-10896</link>
		<dc:creator>Travis Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 10:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trishussey.com/2009/01/30/does-accepting-a-sponsors-money-mean-you-condone-or-support-them/#comment-10896</guid>
		<description>Tris, 
 
Thanks for blogging about this.  Here&#039;s the organizing committee&#039;s take on the situation: 
 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://2009.northernvoice.ca/blog/reactions-sponsorships&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://2009.northernvoice.ca/blog/reactions-sponsorships&lt;/a&gt;&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://2009.northernvoice.ca/blog/reactions-spons...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
 
TTFN 
Travis</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tris, </p>
<p>Thanks for blogging about this.  Here&#039;s the organizing committee&#039;s take on the situation: </p>
<p><a href="http://2009.northernvoice.ca/blog/reactions-sponsorships" rel="nofollow">&lt;a href=&quot;</a><a href="http://2009.northernvoice.ca/blog/reactions-sponsorships" rel="nofollow">http://2009.northernvoice.ca/blog/reactions-sponsorships</a>&#8221; target=&#8221;_blank&#8221;&gt;<a href="http://2009.northernvoice.ca/blog/reactions-spons..." rel="nofollow">http://2009.northernvoice.ca/blog/reactions-spons&#8230;</a></p>
<p>TTFN<br />
Travis</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

